CarThreat
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Services
    • Contact
Notification
  • Autonomous Driving
  • Automotive Ethernet
  • BMS
  • ECU
  • EV
  • ISO/SAE 21434
  • Infotainment
  • OTA Updates
  • OBD-II
  • Pwn2Own
  • RCE
  • SDVs
  • TCU
  • UNECE R155
Cybersecurity

Boston police tested Motorola and Axon readers as Flock exited

Cybersecurity

Leapmotor EVs carry cameras from a supplier Australia banned

Policy & Compliance

BYD rewrites Australian privacy policy after Four Corners questions

Cybersecurity

A passwordless port let a researcher command a moving BYD ute

Font ResizerAa
CarThreatCarThreat
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Events
  • About
Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Services
    • Contact
Sign In Sign In
Follow US
© 2026 Carthreat.com. All right reserved.
Policy & Compliance

Court orders Massachusetts state police to open plate reader files

A Suffolk Superior Court judge says the agency cannot keep hiding where its license plate cameras are or how troopers use them.

CarThreat Staff
Last updated: September 6, 2026 8:59 pm
By
ctadmin
1 Min Read
SHARE

The secrecy around Massachusetts state police license plate readers is cracking. A Suffolk Superior Court judge granted summary judgment this week in a five-year ACLU fight, ruling that the agency had no proper grounds to withhold where its cameras sit and how troopers use them.

The civil liberties group announced the outcome Wednesday. Its lawsuit over the records dates to 2023, and the court wants a sample audit of plate reader activity delivered within days.

ACLU technology and justice programs director Kade Crockford described a statewide wave of anger at covert surveillance, with towns organizing against Flock and similar systems while few residents realized the state police run their own network of readers.

The decision follows a season of abuse allegations against the technology. Communities across Massachusetts have paused or scrapped Flock contracts, officers have faced discipline for using the cameras to follow romantic partners, and the state police had not commented on the ruling when it was announced.

Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
TAGGED:CybersecurityData PrivacyPlate ReadersRegulationsVehicle Surveillance
SOURCES:WCVB Boston
Share This Article
Facebook Email Copy Link

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

You Might Also Like

Cybersecurity

UK charger industry ranks unsigned firmware as its top security risk

By
ctadmin
September 7, 2026
Policy & Compliance

Carmakers’ lobby presses Congress to bar Chinese connected vehicles this year

By
ctadmin
September 5, 2026
Cybersecurity

Camouflaged patches can hide traffic lights from self-driving cars

By
ctadmin
August 13, 2026
Anime illustration of a fleet van whose rooftop telematics signal breaks apart
Cybersecurity

Fleet tracker Cartrack draws a South African privacy probe after August ransomware

By
ctadmin
September 19, 2026
Cybersecurity

GM widens in-car recording while promising footage stays local

By
ctadmin
September 12, 2026
Cybersecurity

One VIN number can unlock years of driver tracking

By
ctadmin
August 9, 2026

CarThreat

Intelligence for the EV and automotive security market
  • News
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Events
  • About Carthreat
  • Our Mission
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • OBD-II
  • Automotive Ethernet
  • TCU
  • Infotainment Systems
  • SDVs
  • BMS
  • ECU Security
  • CAN Bus
  • OTA Updates
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Relay Attacks
  • RCE
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Cybersecurity
  • Digital Keys
  • Bluetooth Security
  • ISO/SAE 21434
  • UNECE R155
  • Regulations
  • Data Privacy
  • EVs
  • Autonomous Driving
  • Pwn2Own Automotive

© 2026 Carthreat.com. All right reserved.  Privacy Policy | Legal

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?